Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni
Program Studi S1 Sastra Inggris (Kampus Kabupaten Magetan)

Kode Dokumen

SEMESTER LEARNING PLAN

Course

KODE

Rumpun MataKuliah

Bobot Kredit

SEMESTER

Tanggal Penyusunan

Appraisal Theory in Use

7922102088

T=2

P=0

ECTS=3.18

7

22 November 2024

OTORISASI

Pengembang S.P

Koordinator Rumpun matakuliah

Koordinator Program Studi




.......................................


.......................................


Lisetyo Ariyanti, S.S., M.Pd.

Model Pembelajaran

Project Based Learning

Program Learning Outcomes (PLO)

PLO program Studi yang dibebankan pada matakuliah

Program Objectives (PO)

PO - 1

Define and explain the categories of Appraisal Theory (Attitude, Engagement, and Graduation).

PO - 2

Apply Appraisal Theory to analyze evaluative language in literary works, focusing on attitude, judgment, and appreciation.

PO - 3

Critically assess how authors use evaluative strategies to influence readers‘ emotional and intellectual engagement with texts.

PO - 4

Engage in discussions about the implications of evaluative language for literary meaning and interpretation

Matrik PLO-PO
 
PO
PO-1
PO-2
PO-3
PO-4

Matrik PO pada Kemampuan akhir tiap tahapan belajar (Sub-PO)
 
PO Minggu Ke
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
PO-1
PO-2
PO-3
PO-4

Deskripsi Singkat Mata Kuliah

The course emphasizes the application of Appraisal Theory to analyze texts in the context of English literature. Students will explore how authors express emotions, judgments, and appreciation in literary texts, as well as how these evaluative strategies shape readers’ interpretations. Through practical analysis and theoretical discussions, students will develop a nuanced understanding of evaluative language and its role in literature.

Pustaka

Utama :

  1. Martin, J.R. & White, P.R.R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English.
  2. Bednarek, M. (2008). Emotion Talk Across Corpora
  3. Hood, S. (2010). Appraising Research: Evaluation in Academic Writing.
  4. Martin, J.R. & Rose, D. (2007). Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause.

Pendukung :

  1. Journals

Dosen Pengampu

Minggu Ke-

Kemampuan akhir tiap tahapan belajar
(Sub-PO)

Penilaian

Bantuk Pembelajaran,

Metode Pembelajaran,

Penugasan Mahasiswa,

 [ Estimasi Waktu]

Materi Pembelajaran

[ Pustaka ]

Bobot Penilaian (%)

Indikator

Kriteria & Bentuk

Luring (offline)

Daring (online)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

1

Minggu ke 1

Being able to Define the key concepts of Appraisal Theory

Define the three main categories of Appraisal Theory: Attitude, Engagement, and Graduation

 Kriteria:
  1. Short essay explaining key concepts of Appraisal Theory (20%)
  2. In-class participation in discussions on evaluative language (10%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Penilaian Portofolio		 Offline
2 X 50		 Online
2 X 50		 Materi: three main categories of Appraisal Theory
Pustaka: Martin, J.R. & White, P.R.R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English.		 5%

2

Minggu ke 2

Being able to Define the key concepts of Appraisal Theory

Identify examples of evaluative language (affect, judgment, and appreciation) in literary texts.

 Kriteria:
  1. Short essay explaining key concepts of Appraisal Theory (20%)
  2. In-class participation in discussions on evaluative language (10%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Penilaian Portofolio		 Offline
2 X 50		 Online
2 X 50		 Materi: evaluative language (affect, judgment, and appreciation) in literary texts.
Pustaka: Martin, J.R. & White, P.R.R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English.		 5%

3

Minggu ke 3

Being able to Define the key concepts of Appraisal Theory

Recognize how evaluative language influences readers' responses

 Kriteria:
  1. Short essay explaining key concepts of Appraisal Theory (20%)
  2. In-class participation in discussions on evaluative language (10%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Penilaian Portofolio		 Offline
2 X 50		 Online
2 X 50		 Materi: how evaluative language influences readers' responses.
Pustaka: Martin, J.R. & White, P.R.R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English.		 5%

4

Minggu ke 4

Being able to Define the key concepts of Appraisal Theory

Explain the role of engagement and graduation in modifying meaning and intensifying evaluation.

 Kriteria:
  1. Short essay explaining key concepts of Appraisal Theory (20%)
  2. In-class participation in discussions on evaluative language (10%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Penilaian Portofolio		 Offline
2 X 50		 Online
2 X 50		 Materi: the role of engagement and graduation in modifying meaning and intensifying evaluation.
Pustaka: Martin, J.R. & White, P.R.R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English.		 5%

5

Minggu ke 5

Being Able to Apply Appraisal Theory to Literary Texts

Analyze attitudes (affect, judgment, and appreciation) expressed in a literary text.

 Kriteria:
  1. Analysis of a selected literary text using Appraisal Theory (25%)
  2. Peer review on evaluative strategies identified in texts (10%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk, Penilaian Portofolio		 Luring
2 X 50		 Daring
2 X 50		 Materi: attitudes (affect, judgment, and appreciation) expressed in a literary text
Pustaka: Bednarek, M. (2008). Emotion Talk Across Corpora		 5%

6

Minggu ke 6

Being Able to Apply Appraisal Theory to Literary Texts

Demonstrate how engagement devices position readers toward particular interpretations

 Kriteria:
  1. Analysis of a selected literary text using Appraisal Theory (25%)
  2. Peer review on evaluative strategies identified in texts (10%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk, Penilaian Portofolio		 Luring
2 X 50		 Daring
2 X 50		 Materi: engagement devices position readers and their interpretations
Pustaka: Bednarek, M. (2008). Emotion Talk Across Corpora		 5%

7

Minggu ke 7

Being Able to Apply Appraisal Theory to Literary Texts

Apply graduation strategies to analyze how intensity and focus shape meaning.

 Kriteria:
  1. Analysis of a selected literary text using Appraisal Theory (25%)
  2. Peer review on evaluative strategies identified in texts (10%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk, Penilaian Portofolio		 Luring
2 X 50		 Daring
2 X 50		 Materi: graduation strategies and how intensity and focus shape meaning
Pustaka: Bednarek, M. (2008). Emotion Talk Across Corpora		 5%

8

Minggu ke 8

Being Able to Apply Appraisal Theory to Literary Texts

Provide critical commentary on the use of evaluative language in character development and thematic exploration

 Kriteria:
  1. Analysis of a selected literary text using Appraisal Theory (25%)
  2. Peer review on evaluative strategies identified in texts (10%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk, Penilaian Portofolio		 Luring
2 X 50		 Daring
2 X 50		 Materi: the use of evaluative language in character development and thematic exploration
Pustaka: Bednarek, M. (2008). Emotion Talk Across Corpora		 5%

9

Minggu ke 9

Bein able to Critically Assess Evaluative Strategies in Literature

Identify how authors use evaluative language to influence readers’ emotional responses.

 Kriteria:
  1. Critical essay evaluating the use of Appraisal Theory in a literary context (20%)
  2. Group presentation on evaluative strategies in a selected novel or poem (15%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Offline
2 X 50		 Online
2 X 50		 Materi: authors and evaluative language to influence readers’ emotional responses
Pustaka: Martin, J.R. & Rose, D. (2007). Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause.		 5%

10

Minggu ke 10

Bein able to Critically Assess Evaluative Strategies in Literature

Evaluate the role of judgment in shaping the ethical perspectives of literary characters.

 Kriteria:
  1. Critical essay evaluating the use of Appraisal Theory in a literary context (20%)
  2. Group presentation on evaluative strategies in a selected novel or poem (15%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Offline
2 X 50		 Online
2 X 50		 Materi: the role of judgment in shaping the ethical perspectives of literary characters
Pustaka: Martin, J.R. & Rose, D. (2007). Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause.		 5%

11

Minggu ke 11

Bein able to Critically Assess Evaluative Strategies in Literature

Critically assess the implications of appreciation in conveying aesthetic values in literature.

 Kriteria:
  1. Critical essay evaluating the use of Appraisal Theory in a literary context (20%)
  2. Group presentation on evaluative strategies in a selected novel or poem (15%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Offline
2 X 50		 Online
2 X 50		 Materi: authors and evaluative language to influence readers’ emotional responses
Pustaka: Martin, J.R. & Rose, D. (2007). Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause.
Materi: the implications of appreciation in conveying aesthetic values in literature
Pustaka: Martin, J.R. & Rose, D. (2007). Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause.		 5%

12

Minggu ke 12

Bein able to Critically Assess Evaluative Strategies in Literature

Discuss how evaluative language affects interpretations of social and cultural contexts within literary works.

 Kriteria:
  1. Critical essay evaluating the use of Appraisal Theory in a literary context (20%)
  2. Group presentation on evaluative strategies in a selected novel or poem (15%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Offline
2 X 50		 Online
2 X 50		 Materi: authors and evaluative language to influence readers’ emotional responses
Pustaka: Martin, J.R. & Rose, D. (2007). Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause.
Materi: evaluative language affects interpretations of social and cultural contexts within literary works.
Pustaka: Martin, J.R. & Rose, D. (2007). Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause.		 5%

13

Minggu ke 13

Being able to engage in Discussions About Evaluative Language and Literary Interpretation

Engage in scholarly discussions about how evaluative language shapes literary meaning.

 Kriteria:
  1. Participation in class discussions and debates (20%)
  2. Reflection on how evaluative language contributes to literary interpretation (10%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Offline
2 X 50		 Online
2 X 50		 Materi: how evaluative language shapes literary meaning
Pustaka: Hood, S. (2010). Appraising Research: Evaluation in Academic Writing.		 10%

14

Minggu ke 14

Being able to engage in Discussions About Evaluative Language and Literary Interpretation

Reflect on the role of affect, judgment, and appreciation in reader interpretation.

 Kriteria:
  1. Participation in class discussions and debates (20%)
  2. Reflection on how evaluative language contributes to literary interpretation (10%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Offline
2 X 50		 Online
2 X 50		 Materi: the role of affect, judgment, and appreciation in reader interpretation.
Pustaka: Hood, S. (2010). Appraising Research: Evaluation in Academic Writing.		 10%

15

Minggu ke 15

Being able to engage in Discussions About Evaluative Language and Literary Interpretation

Critically evaluate the broader implications of evaluative strategies in social and cultural contexts.

 Kriteria:
  1. Participation in class discussions and debates (20%)
  2. Reflection on how evaluative language contributes to literary interpretation (10%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Offline
2 X 50		 Online
2 X 50		 Materi: he broader implications of evaluative strategies in social and cultural contexts.
Pustaka: Hood, S. (2010). Appraising Research: Evaluation in Academic Writing.
Materi: The broader implications of evaluative strategies in social and cultural contexts.
Pustaka: Hood, S. (2010). Appraising Research: Evaluation in Academic Writing.		 10%

16

Minggu ke 16



0%



Rekap Persentase Evaluasi : Project Based Learning

No Evaluasi Persentase
1. Aktifitas Partisipasif 25%
2. Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk 20%
3. Penilaian Portofolio 20%
4. Praktik / Unjuk Kerja 25%
90%

Catatan

  1. Capaian Pembelajaran Lulusan Program Studi (PLO - Program Studi) adalah kemampuan yang dimiliki oleh setiap lulusan Program Studi yang merupakan internalisasi dari sikap, penguasaan pengetahuan dan ketrampilan sesuai dengan jenjang prodinya yang diperoleh melalui proses pembelajaran.
  2. PLO yang dibebankan pada mata kuliah adalah beberapa capaian pembelajaran lulusan program studi (CPL-Program Studi) yang digunakan untuk pembentukan/pengembangan sebuah mata kuliah yang terdiri dari aspek sikap, ketrampulan umum, ketrampilan khusus dan pengetahuan.
  3. Program Objectives (PO) adalah kemampuan yang dijabarkan secara spesifik dari PLO yang dibebankan pada mata kuliah, dan bersifat spesifik terhadap bahan kajian atau materi pembelajaran mata kuliah tersebut.
  4. Sub-PO Mata kuliah (Sub-PO) adalah kemampuan yang dijabarkan secara spesifik dari PO yang dapat diukur atau diamati dan merupakan kemampuan akhir yang direncanakan pada tiap tahap pembelajaran, dan bersifat spesifik terhadap materi pembelajaran mata kuliah tersebut.
  5. Indikator penilaian kemampuan dalam proses maupun hasil belajar mahasiswa adalah pernyataan spesifik dan terukur yang mengidentifikasi kemampuan atau kinerja hasil belajar mahasiswa yang disertai bukti-bukti.
  6. Kreteria Penilaian adalah patokan yang digunakan sebagai ukuran atau tolok ukur ketercapaian pembelajaran dalam penilaian berdasarkan indikator-indikator yang telah ditetapkan. Kreteria penilaian merupakan pedoman bagi penilai agar penilaian konsisten dan tidak bias. Kreteria dapat berupa kuantitatif ataupun kualitatif.
  7. Bentuk penilaian: tes dan non-tes.
  8. Bentuk pembelajaran: Kuliah, Responsi, Tutorial, Seminar atau yang setara, Praktikum, Praktik Studio, Praktik Bengkel, Praktik Lapangan, Penelitian, Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat dan/atau bentuk pembelajaran lain yang setara.
  9. Metode Pembelajaran: Small Group Discussion, Role-Play & Simulation, Discovery Learning, Self-Directed Learning, Cooperative Learning, Collaborative Learning, Contextual Learning, Project Based Learning, dan metode lainnya yg setara.
  10. Materi Pembelajaran adalah rincian atau uraian dari bahan kajian yg dapat disajikan dalam bentuk beberapa pokok dan sub-pokok bahasan.
  11. Bobot penilaian adalah prosentasi penilaian terhadap setiap pencapaian sub-PO yang besarnya proposional dengan tingkat kesulitan pencapaian sub-PO tsb., dan totalnya 100%.
  12. TM=Tatap Muka, PT=Penugasan terstruktur, BM=Belajar mandiri.