Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni
Program Studi S1 Sastra Inggris

Kode Dokumen

SEMESTER LEARNING PLAN

Course

KODE

Rumpun MataKuliah

Bobot Kredit

SEMESTER

Tanggal Penyusunan

Functional Grammar in Use

7920203337

Mata Kuliah Wajib Program Studi

T=3

P=0

ECTS=4.77

3

9 Agustus 2024

OTORISASI

Pengembang S.P

Koordinator Rumpun matakuliah

Koordinator Program Studi




Fariq Shiddiq Tasaufy, S.S., M.Hum.




Dr. Dian Rivia Himmawati, S.S., M.Hum.




Dr. Ali Mustofa, S.S., M.Pd.

Model Pembelajaran

Project Based Learning

Program Learning Outcomes (PLO)

PLO program Studi yang dibebankan pada matakuliah

PLO-3

Mengembangkan pemikiran logis, kritis, sistematis, dan kreatif dalam melakukan pekerjaan yang spesifik di bidang keahliannya serta sesuai dengan standar kompetensi kerja bidang yang bersangkutan

PLO-5

Mampu mengaplikasikan konsep dan teori Linguistik dasar dalam Bahasa Inggris untuk merespons beragam fenomena bahasa

PLO-7

Mampu mengaplikasikan konsep dan teori budaya untuk menganalisis serta merespons fenomena sosial budaya dengan cara yang responsif terhadap budaya

PLO-11

Mampu mendemonstrasikan kemampuan berbahasa Inggris, yang ditunjukkan dengan pencapaian skor tes kemampuan Bahasa Inggris yang setara dengan minimal CEFR level B2

Program Objectives (PO)

PO - 1

Demonstrate proficiency in Functional Grammar for communicative purpose in social context

PO - 2

Understand the form, function, and structure of linguistic unit based on Functional Grammar from different texts

PO - 3

Identify the language in use in different texts and genres based on Functional Grammar perspective

PO - 4

Analyze texts in various sociocultural context using Functional Grammar

Matrik PLO-PO

 
POPLO-3PLO-5PLO-7PLO-11
PO-1   
PO-2   
PO-3   
PO-4   

Matrik PO pada Kemampuan akhir tiap tahapan belajar (Sub-PO)

 
PO Minggu Ke
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
PO-1
PO-2
PO-3
PO-4

Deskripsi Singkat Mata Kuliah

This course equips students with practical skills in applying functional grammar principles to analyze and interpret language in real-world contexts. It integrates theoretical foundations with hands-on application, emphasizing the functional perspective of grammar and its relevance in understanding how language functions in communication. The Students will be introduced to the framework for analyzing grammar and meaning along three dimensions: (1) how language represents states and activities, (2) how language functions in the interaction between people, and (3) how information is structured in sentences and texts. Through theoretical inputs and practical activities, students will raise their awareness of how language users convey meaning through their choice of words and grammatical structures in specific situations. The course will additionally include analyses of authentic texts in various genres, touching upon various SDG issues focused on gender equality (SDG 5), reduced inequality (SDG 10), and no poverty (SDG 1). This course will use a range of assessment tasks including text analyses and interpretation, projects, and written tests. By the end of the course, the students will deepen their understanding of grammatical structures and their functional significance in various genres while also carrying out critical analyses and developing collaboration skills essential for future academic and professional endeavours.

Pustaka

Utama :

  1. Fontaine, L. (2012). Analysing English grammar: A systemic functional introduction. Cambridge University Press.
  2. Bartlett, T., & O'Grady, G. (Eds.). (2017). The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics. London: Routledge.
  3. Halliday, MAK, Matthiesen, CMIM. 2001. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd Edition. London. Hodder Headline Group.
  4. Martin, J. R. (1992). English Text: System and Structure. Benjamins.
  5. Meyer, C. F. (2009). The structure of English texts. In Introducing English Linguistics (pp. 79–110). chapter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pendukung :

  1. Hasan, R., Cloran, C., & Butt, D. G. (Eds.). (1996). Functional descriptions: Theory in practice (Vol. 121). John Benjamins Publishing.

Dosen Pengampu

Minggu Ke-

Kemampuan akhir tiap tahapan belajar
(Sub-PO)

Penilaian

Bantuk Pembelajaran,

Metode Pembelajaran,

Penugasan Mahasiswa,

 [ Estimasi Waktu]

Materi Pembelajaran

[ Pustaka ]

Bobot Penilaian (%)

Indikator

Kriteria & Bentuk

Luring (offline)

Daring (online)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

1

Minggu ke 1

Able to understand the scope of Functional Grammar

Explain the scope of Functional Grammar in communicative functions (oral and written).

Kriteria:
  1. Describe the range of communicative functions that Functional Grammar addresses, such as information exchange, social interaction, and textual organization.
  2. Provide detailed examples from both oral and written texts to illustrate how Functional Grammar operates in different communicative scenarios.

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif
Interactive learning and small group discussion
150 menit

Materi: Introduction to Functional Grammar in Use
Pustaka: Halliday, MAK, Matthiesen, CMIM. 2001. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd Edition. London. Hodder Headline Group.
2%

2

Minggu ke 2

Able to understand the dimensions of text and context

Explain the concept of register, genre, field, mode and tenor

Kriteria:
  1. Provide a precise definition of "register" as the variation in language use depending on the social setting or context
  2. Define "genre" as the category of text or discourse characterized by specific conventions and structures
  3. Explain "field" as the content or subject matter of the communication, describing what is happening and what is being talked about
  4. Explain "tenor" as the social relationships and roles of participants in the communication, including their status and interpersonal dynamics

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif
Interactive learning and small group discussion
150 menit

Materi: The dimension of text.
Pustaka: Meyer, C. F. (2009). The structure of English texts. In Introducing English Linguistics (pp. 79–110). chapter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Materi: Context: Field, Mode, and Tenor
Pustaka: Martin, J. R. (1992). English Text: System and Structure. Benjamins.
3%

3

Minggu ke 3

Able to explain the structure of a text

Clearly explains how the text’s structure supports the overall message or purpose in each stage, including how ideas are organized and how transitions are used.

Kriteria:
  1. Clearly identify and describe the main structural components of the text (e.g., introduction, body, conclusion, sections, or paragraphs)
  2. Analyze how ideas are organized within the text, including the sequence and grouping of information

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif
Interactive learning and small group discussion
150 menit

Materi: Text Structure and stages
Pustaka: Meyer, C. F. (2009). The structure of English texts. In Introducing English Linguistics (pp. 79–110). chapter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Materi: Text Components
Pustaka: Martin, J. R. (1992). English Text: System and Structure. Benjamins.
3%

4

Minggu ke 4

Able to explain the form and function of the ranks system within the text

Summarize the concept of rank systems; Clause, groups, words, and morpheme

Kriteria:
  1. Describe how groups function as components of clauses, including how they organize related words and their contributions to the overall meaning
  2. Describe the hierarchical relationship among clauses, groups, words, and morphemes, and how each rank fits within the system by using mind-mapping

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif
Interactive Learning and Small Group Discussion
150 menit

Materi: Rank system; clause complex, clause, groups, morpheme.
Pustaka: Fontaine, L. (2012). Analysing English grammar: A systemic functional introduction. Cambridge University Press.
3%

5

Minggu ke 5

Able to Identify the form and function of the ranks system within text

Identify specific ranks or levels described in the given text

Kriteria:
  1. Accurately identify and label the hierarchical levels within the text (e.g., clauses, groups, words, morphemes) using correct terminology
  2. Clearly distinguish between different ranks in the text, demonstrating an understanding of their distinct roles and functions

Bentuk Penilaian :
Praktik / Unjuk Kerja, Tes
Case Study and Small Group Discussion
150 menit

Materi: Rank system; clause, groups, and word
Pustaka: Fontaine, L. (2012). Analysing English grammar: A systemic functional introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Materi: The function of groups
Pustaka: Fontaine, L. (2012). Analysing English grammar: A systemic functional introduction. Cambridge University Press.
3%

6

Minggu ke 6

Able to explain the Experiential Metafunction

Classify the process, participants, and circumstances from various genres

Kriteria:
  1. Accurately identify and classify different types of processes within texts, such as material, mental, relational, and behavioral processes
  2. Accurately classify the circumstances

Bentuk Penilaian :
Praktik / Unjuk Kerja
Interactive Learning and Small Group Discussion
150 menit

Materi: Experiential Metafunction
Pustaka: Fontaine, L. (2012). Analysing English grammar: A systemic functional introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Materi: Types of Process and Experiential Elements
Pustaka: Fontaine, L. (2012). Analysing English grammar: A systemic functional introduction. Cambridge University Press.
3%

7

Minggu ke 7

Able to Identify the form and function of Experiential Metafunction

Identify the transitivity of clauses from different genres of text based on functional grammar

Kriteria:
  1. Use Functional Grammar terminology correctly, such as "participant," "process," "circumstance," and how they relate to transitivity
  2. Identify the type of process associated with each clause (e.g., material, mental, relational) and its relation to transitivity

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Tes
Small Group Discussion and Case Study
150 menit

Materi: Experiential Metafunction
Pustaka: Fontaine, L. (2012). Analysing English grammar: A systemic functional introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Materi: Process and other Experiential elements
Pustaka: Fontaine, L. (2012). Analysing English grammar: A systemic functional introduction. Cambridge University Press.
4%

8

Minggu ke 8

Able to analyze the ranks and transitivity that are represented within the text

Identify the ranks and transitivity within the text from music lyric

Kriteria:

Precisely use functional grammar terminology to identify the rank systems and transitivity of clause from authentic text


Bentuk Penilaian :
Tes
Case Study
150 menit

Materi: Structure of text
Pustaka: Meyer, C. F. (2009). The structure of English texts. In Introducing English Linguistics (pp. 79–110). chapter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Materi: Rank system
Pustaka: Fontaine, L. (2012). Analysing English grammar: A systemic functional introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Materi: Experiential Metafunction
Pustaka: Fontaine, L. (2012). Analysing English grammar: A systemic functional introduction. Cambridge University Press.
20%

9

Minggu ke 9

Able to Explain the Interpersonal Metafunction

Outline the elements of Interpersonal Metafucntion; mood system and finite elements

Kriteria:
  1. Describe how the Interpersonal Metafunction structures interactions, including how it represents roles, relationships, and the speaker’s stance
  2. Describe how finite elements express tense, mood, and modality, and their importance in establishing the clause's interpersonal function
  3. Provide clear examples from a range of texts or spoken interactions to illustrate the use of each mood type

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif
Interactive Learning and Small Group Discussion
150 menit

Materi: MOOD Systems
Pustaka: Fontaine, L. (2012). Analysing English grammar: A systemic functional introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Materi: Finite Elements
Pustaka: Bartlett, T., & O'Grady, G. (Eds.). (2017). The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics. London: Routledge.
2%

10

Minggu ke 10

Able to Identify the form and function of Interpersonal Metafunction

Identify the Mood relation between the Subject and the Finite of the clauses within the text

Kriteria:
  1. Accurately identify the mood type of each clause within the text
  2. Accurately identify the subject and finite verb form in each clause
  3. Accurately identify the mood type of each clause within the text. This includes recognizing whether a clause is declarative (statement), interrogative (question), or imperative (command/request)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Tes
Small Group Discussion and Case Study
150 menit

Materi: Finite Elements
Pustaka: Bartlett, T., & O'Grady, G. (Eds.). (2017). The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics. London: Routledge.

Materi: MOOD Systems
Pustaka: Fontaine, L. (2012). Analysing English grammar: A systemic functional introduction. Cambridge University Press.
4%

11

Minggu ke 11

Able to Explain the Textual Metafunction

Distinguish the difference between topical, interpersonal, and textual themes

Kriteria:
  1. Define accurately the topical theme, textual theme and interpersonal theme
  2. Accurately identify each theme in various clauses by locating the core element
  3. Highlight differences in how each type of theme functions and contributes to the overall structure and meaning

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Tes
Small Group Discussion and Interactive Learning
150 menit

Materi: Given and New information
Pustaka: Fontaine, L. (2012). Analysing English grammar: A systemic functional introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Materi: Structure of Textual Metafunction
Pustaka: Fontaine, L. (2012). Analysing English grammar: A systemic functional introduction. Cambridge University Press.
3%

12

Minggu ke 12

Able to Identify the form and function Identify the Textual Metafunction

Identify thematization and the organization of the text

Kriteria:
  1. Accurate identification of thematization
  2. Accurate analysis of Thematic Structure
  3. Accurate Identification of organizational patterns

Bentuk Penilaian :
Tes
Interactive Learning and Case Study
150 menit

Materi: Given and New information
Pustaka: Fontaine, L. (2012). Analysing English grammar: A systemic functional introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Materi: Structure of Textual Metafunction
Pustaka: Fontaine, L. (2012). Analysing English grammar: A systemic functional introduction. Cambridge University Press.
4%

13

Minggu ke 13

Able to apply the concept of three Metafunctions

  1. Identify the interpersonal metafunction structure of clause from various texts
  2. Identify the experiential metafunction structure of clause from various texts
  3. Identify the textual metafunction structure of clause from various texts
Kriteria:
  1. Accurate identification of enterpersonal metafunction elements
  2. Accurate identification of experiential metafunction elements
  3. Accurate identification of textual metafunction elements

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja, Tes
Interactive Learning and Small Group Discussion
150 menit

Materi: How to use three categories of metafunctions
Pustaka: Fontaine, L. (2012). Analysing English grammar: A systemic functional introduction. Cambridge University Press.
5%

14

Minggu ke 14

Able to Interpret text based on three Metafunctions

Examine the clause metafunctional structure

Kriteria:
  1. Students able to identify precisely the structure of clause based on Functional grammar perspective
  2. Students able to distinguish the meaning represented by three categories of metafunctions

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja
Case Study
150 menit

Materi: How to interpret the text based on three metafuntions
Pustaka: Fontaine, L. (2012). Analysing English grammar: A systemic functional introduction. Cambridge University Press.
5%

15

Minggu ke 15

Able to Interpret text based on three Metafunctions

Examine the clause metafunctional structure

Kriteria:
  1. Students able to identify precisely the structure of clause based on Functional grammar perspective
  2. Students able to distinguish the meaning represented by three categories of metafunctions

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja
Case Study
150 menit

Materi: How to interpret the text based on three metafuntions
Pustaka: Fontaine, L. (2012). Analysing English grammar: A systemic functional introduction. Cambridge University Press.
5%

16

Minggu ke 16

Able to analyze song lyrics based on Functional Gramar

  1. Identify the metafunctional structure
  2. Compare the metafunctional structure
  3. Interpret the text based on metafuntional structure
Kriteria:
  1. Demonstrate a clear understanding of the three metafunctions (ideational, interpersonal, and textual) by correctly identifying them within a given text.
  2. Compare the use of metafunctions across different texts or within different sections of the same text, highlighting similarities and differences.
  3. Use the identified metafunctions to provide a coherent interpretation of the text, explaining how each metafunction contributes to the overall meaning.

Bentuk Penilaian :
Tes
Case Study
150 menit

Materi: Analyzing text based on Functional Grammar perspective
Pustaka: Fontaine, L. (2012). Analysing English grammar: A systemic functional introduction. Cambridge University Press.
30%



Rekap Persentase Evaluasi : Project Based Learning

No Evaluasi Persentase
1. Aktifitas Partisipasif 25.17%
2. Praktik / Unjuk Kerja 11.17%
3. Tes 62.67%
99.01%

Catatan

  1. Capaian Pembelajaran Lulusan Program Studi (PLO - Program Studi) adalah kemampuan yang dimiliki oleh setiap lulusan Program Studi yang merupakan internalisasi dari sikap, penguasaan pengetahuan dan ketrampilan sesuai dengan jenjang prodinya yang diperoleh melalui proses pembelajaran.
  2. PLO yang dibebankan pada mata kuliah adalah beberapa capaian pembelajaran lulusan program studi (CPL-Program Studi) yang digunakan untuk pembentukan/pengembangan sebuah mata kuliah yang terdiri dari aspek sikap, ketrampulan umum, ketrampilan khusus dan pengetahuan.
  3. Program Objectives (PO) adalah kemampuan yang dijabarkan secara spesifik dari PLO yang dibebankan pada mata kuliah, dan bersifat spesifik terhadap bahan kajian atau materi pembelajaran mata kuliah tersebut.
  4. Sub-PO Mata kuliah (Sub-PO) adalah kemampuan yang dijabarkan secara spesifik dari PO yang dapat diukur atau diamati dan merupakan kemampuan akhir yang direncanakan pada tiap tahap pembelajaran, dan bersifat spesifik terhadap materi pembelajaran mata kuliah tersebut.
  5. Indikator penilaian kemampuan dalam proses maupun hasil belajar mahasiswa adalah pernyataan spesifik dan terukur yang mengidentifikasi kemampuan atau kinerja hasil belajar mahasiswa yang disertai bukti-bukti.
  6. Kreteria Penilaian adalah patokan yang digunakan sebagai ukuran atau tolok ukur ketercapaian pembelajaran dalam penilaian berdasarkan indikator-indikator yang telah ditetapkan. Kreteria penilaian merupakan pedoman bagi penilai agar penilaian konsisten dan tidak bias. Kreteria dapat berupa kuantitatif ataupun kualitatif.
  7. Bentuk penilaian: tes dan non-tes.
  8. Bentuk pembelajaran: Kuliah, Responsi, Tutorial, Seminar atau yang setara, Praktikum, Praktik Studio, Praktik Bengkel, Praktik Lapangan, Penelitian, Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat dan/atau bentuk pembelajaran lain yang setara.
  9. Metode Pembelajaran: Small Group Discussion, Role-Play & Simulation, Discovery Learning, Self-Directed Learning, Cooperative Learning, Collaborative Learning, Contextual Learning, Project Based Learning, dan metode lainnya yg setara.
  10. Materi Pembelajaran adalah rincian atau uraian dari bahan kajian yg dapat disajikan dalam bentuk beberapa pokok dan sub-pokok bahasan.
  11. Bobot penilaian adalah prosentasi penilaian terhadap setiap pencapaian sub-PO yang besarnya proposional dengan tingkat kesulitan pencapaian sub-PO tsb., dan totalnya 100%.
  12. TM=Tatap Muka, PT=Penugasan terstruktur, BM=Belajar mandiri.