Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni
Program Studi S1 Sastra Inggris

Kode Dokumen

SEMESTER LEARNING PLAN

Course

KODE

Rumpun MataKuliah

Bobot Kredit

SEMESTER

Tanggal Penyusunan

Academic Writing for Research Purposes

7920204316

T=4

P=0

ECTS=6.36

4

22 November 2024

OTORISASI

Pengembang S.P

Koordinator Rumpun matakuliah

Koordinator Program Studi




Zulidyana Dwi Rusnalasari


Cicilia Diandra


Dr. Ali Mustofa, S.S., M.Pd.

Model Pembelajaran

Project Based Learning

Program Learning Outcomes (PLO)

PLO program Studi yang dibebankan pada matakuliah

Program Objectives (PO)

PO - 1

Being able to understand the principles of academic writing

PO - 2

Being able to write an essay based on a preferred topic related to the final assignment for undergraduate level

PO - 3

Being able to compose texts on the preferred topic using appropriate language and mechanics

PO - 4

Being able to present original and creative works, engage in group discussion, solve problems with critical thinking during class discussion and presentations.

Matrik PLO-PO
 
PO
PO-1
PO-2
PO-3
PO-4

Matrik PO pada Kemampuan akhir tiap tahapan belajar (Sub-PO)
 
PO Minggu Ke
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
PO-1
PO-2
PO-3
PO-4

Deskripsi Singkat Mata Kuliah

This course is designed to improve students’ academic writing skills. It covers different aspects of academic writing such as critical thinking, research skills, citation and referencing, academic language, and reflective practice.

Pustaka

Utama :

  1. Bailey, S. 2011. Academic writing: A handbook for international students (Third ed. )
  2. Coe, Norman., et.al. 1986. Writing Skills. London: Cambridge University Press
  3. Kiszner, Laurie G. dan Stephen R. Mandell. 1983. Patterns for College Writing: A Rhetorical Reader and Guide. New York: St
  4. Oshima, Alice and Hogue, Ann. 1999. Writing Academic English. New York: Longman

Pendukung :

  1. Journals
  2. Mendeley Reference Manager

Dosen Pengampu

Minggu Ke-

Kemampuan akhir tiap tahapan belajar
(Sub-PO)

Penilaian

Bantuk Pembelajaran,

Metode Pembelajaran,

Penugasan Mahasiswa,

 [ Estimasi Waktu]

Materi Pembelajaran

[ Pustaka ]

Bobot Penilaian (%)

Indikator

Kriteria & Bentuk

Luring (offline)

Daring (online)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

1

Minggu ke 1
  1. Being able to differentiate academic writing from other types of writing
  2. Being able to use appropriate grammar and vocabulary

Complete a worksheet on identifying the characteristics of academic writing and differentiation academic writing from other types using correct grammar

 Kriteria:

Answer 20 multiple choice questions. Each question is worth 5 points.


Bentuk Penilaian :
Tes		 Offline
2 X 50
2 X 50		 Materi: Academic writing definition
Pustaka: Bailey, S. 2011. Academic writing: A handbook for international students (Third ed. )		 5%

2

Minggu ke 2
  1. Being able to differentiate academic writing from other types of writing
  2. Being able to use appropriate grammar and vocabulary

Complete a worksheet on identifying the characteristics of academic writing and differentiation academic writing from other types using correct grammar

 Kriteria:

Answer 20 multiple choice questions. Each question is worth 5 points.


Bentuk Penilaian :
Tes		 Discussion
Individual assignment
2 X 50		 Discussion
Individual assignment
2 X 50		 Materi: Academic writing definition
Pustaka: Bailey, S. 2011. Academic writing: A handbook for international students (Third ed. )		 5%

3

Minggu ke 3

Being able to practice self-reflection and identify areas for improvement in their own writing

Complete reflective notes on student’s writing skill development

 Kriteria:
  1. Depth of Reflection (1-4)
  2. Connection to Experience (1-4)
  3. Grammar and mechanics (1-4)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Portofolio		 Individual assignment
2 X 50		 Individual assignment
 Materi: identify argumentation
Pustaka: Coe, Norman., et.al. 1986. Writing Skills. London: Cambridge University Press		 5%

4

Minggu ke 4
  1. Being able to identify and evaluate arguments
  2. Being able to use appropriate grammar and vocabulary

Answer worksheet in evaluating arguments, avoiding fallacies in reasoning, and defining critical thinking

 Kriteria:

Answer multiple choice questions.


Bentuk Penilaian :
Tes		 Demonstration Discussion Lecturing Question-Answer Exercises
2 X 50		 Demonstration Discussion Lecturing Question-Answer Exercises
 Materi: Identifying arguments
Pustaka: Coe, Norman., et.al. 1986. Writing Skills. London: Cambridge University Press		 5%

5

Minggu ke 5
  1. Being able to identify and evaluate arguments
  2. Being able to use appropriate grammar and vocabulary

Answer worksheet in evaluating arguments, avoiding fallacies in reasoning, and defining critical thinking

 Kriteria:

Answer multiple choice questions.


Bentuk Penilaian :
Tes		 Demonstration Discussion Lecturing Question-Answer Exercises
2 X 50		 Demonstration Discussion Lecturing Question-Answer Exercises
 Materi: Identifying arguments
Pustaka: Coe, Norman., et.al. 1986. Writing Skills. London: Cambridge University Press		 5%

6

Minggu ke 6

Being able to evaluate the credibility and reliability of sources

Classify different types of sources, evaluate the credibility and reliability of sources

 Kriteria:

being able to answer the questions given in the classroom


Bentuk Penilaian :
Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Discussion
Individual assignment
2 X 50		 Discussion
Individual assignment
 Materi: Identifying sources
Pustaka: Bailey, S. 2011. Academic writing: A handbook for international students (Third ed. )
Materi: Using mendeley
Pustaka: Mendeley Reference Manager		 5%

7

Minggu ke 7

Being able to quote, paraphrase, and summarize credible sources

creating quote, paraphrase, and summarize credible sources

 Kriteria:

5


Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Portofolio		 Discussion
Individual assignment
2 X 50		 Discussion
Individual assignment
2 X 50		 Materi: how to create quote, paraphrase, and summarize credible sources
Pustaka: Kiszner, Laurie G. dan Stephen R. Mandell. 1983. Patterns for College Writing: A Rhetorical Reader and Guide. New York: St		 10%

8

Minggu ke 8

Being able to practice self-reflection and identify areas for improvement in their own writing

Complete reflective notes on student’s writing skill development

 Kriteria:
  1. Depth of Reflection (1-4)
  2. Connection to Experience (1-4)
  3. Grammar and mechanics (1-4)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Portofolio		 Individual assignment
2 X 50		 Individual assignment
 Materi: creating their own writing
Pustaka: Oshima, Alice and Hogue, Ann. 1999. Writing Academic English. New York: Longman		 2%

9

Minggu ke 9
  1. Being able to use appropriate citation and referencing in academic writing
  2. Being able to propose a particular topic that is feasible to be researched supported by sufficient references
  1. Compile a list of references from various sources
  2. Produce an annotated bibliography based on at least 10 references to be used in a scholarly paper
 Kriteria:
  1. Content with Title and Theme (1-4)
  2. Accuracy of Writing Procedure (1-4)
  3. Depth/Clarity of Content (1-4)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 The lesson is conducted synchronously with the following steps:
1. Determining fundamental questions: understanding the basic concept of AB
2. Project planning: understanding the procedure of creating AB and grouping
3. Scheduling: creating a project timeline
4. Monitoring: monitoring students participation and AB development, providing input if necessary.
2 X 50		 After watching a video on introduction to AB, the lesson is conducted asynchronously with the following steps:
1. Determining fundamental questions: understanding the basic concept of AB
2. Project planning: understanding the procedure of creating AB and grouping
3. Scheduling: creating a project timeline
4. Monitoring: monitoring students participation and AB development, providing input if necessary.
2 X 50		 Materi: Using Mendeley
Pustaka: Mendeley Reference Manager		 10%

10

Minggu ke 10

Being able to propose a particular topic that is feasible to be researched supported by sufficient references

Produce an annotated bibliography based on at least 10 references to be used in a scholarly paper

 Kriteria:
  1. Content with Title and Theme (1-4)
  2. Accuracy of Writing Procedure (1-4)
  3. Depth/Clarity of Content (1-4)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 The lesson is conducted synchronously with the following steps:
1. Determining fundamental questions: understanding the basic concept of AB
2. Project planning: understanding the procedure of creating AB and grouping
3. Scheduling: creating a project timeline
4. Monitoring: monitoring students participation and AB development, providing input if necessary.
2 X 50		 After watching a video on introduction to AB, the lesson is conducted asynchronously with the following steps:
1. Determining fundamental questions: understanding the basic concept of AB
2. Project planning: understanding the procedure of creating AB and grouping
3. Scheduling: creating a project timeline
4. Monitoring: monitoring students participation and AB development, providing input if necessary.
2 X 50		 Materi: Using Mendeley
Pustaka: Mendeley Reference Manager
Materi: Bibliography
Pustaka: Bailey, S. 2011. Academic writing: A handbook for international students (Third ed. )
Materi: Bibliography
Pustaka: Coe, Norman., et.al. 1986. Writing Skills. London: Cambridge University Press		 5%

11

Minggu ke 11

Being able to propose a particular topic that is feasible to be researched supported by sufficient references

Produce an annotated bibliography based on at least 10 references to be used in a scholarly paper

 Kriteria:
  1. Content with Title and Theme (1-4)
  2. Accuracy of Writing Procedure (1-4)
  3. Depth/Clarity of Content (1-4)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 The lesson is conducted synchronously with the following steps:
1. Monitoring: monitoring student‘s participation and AB development, providing input if necessary.
2. Testing: discussing AB drafts, measuring standard achievements, creating a presentation.
3. Reflection and Evaluation: presenting the project, responding to results, and reflecting on learning.
2 X 50		 The lesson is conducted asynchronously with the following steps:
4. Monitoring: monitoring students participation and AB development, providing input if necessary.
5. Testing: discussing AB drafts, measuring standard achievements, creating a presentation.
6. Reflection and Evaluation: presenting the project, responding to results, and reflecting on learning.
2 X 50		 Materi: Using Mendeley
Pustaka: Mendeley Reference Manager
Materi: Bibliography
Pustaka: Bailey, S. 2011. Academic writing: A handbook for international students (Third ed. )
Materi: Bibliography
Pustaka: Coe, Norman., et.al. 1986. Writing Skills. London: Cambridge University Press		 5%

12

Minggu ke 12

Being able to compose an original academic article on a preferred topic using appropriate grammar and mechanics

Write an original article on the area of literature or linguistics using appropriate structure, grammar, and mechanics

 Kriteria:
  1. Relevant Content with Title and Theme (1-4)
  2. using fluent and logical sequencing and development )1-4)
  3. Mastery of convention and mechanics (1-4)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 The lesson is conducted synchronously with the following steps:
1. Determining fundamental questions: understanding the basic concept of academic article.
2. Project planning: understanding the procedure of creating article.
3. Scheduling: creating a project timeline
4. Monitoring: monitoring students participation and article development, providing input if necessary.
2 X 50		 The lesson is conducted asynchronously with the following steps:
1. Determining fundamental questions: understanding the basic concept of academic article.
2. Project planning: understanding the procedure of creating article.
3. Scheduling: creating a project timeline
4. Monitoring: monitoring students participation and article development, providing input if necessary.
2 X 50		 Materi: relevant journals
Pustaka: Journals		 3%

13

Minggu ke 13

Being able to compose an original academic article on a preferred topic using appropriate grammar and mechanics

Write an original article on the area of literature or linguistics using appropriate structure, grammar, and mechanics

 Kriteria:
  1. Content with Title and Theme (1-4)
  2. Accuracy of Writing Procedure (1-4)
  3. Depth/Clarity of Content (1-4)
  4. Appropriate mechanics used (1-4)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Portofolio		 The lesson is conducted synchronously with the following steps:
1. Determining fundamental questions: understanding the basic concept of academic article.
2. Project planning: understanding the procedure of creating article.
3. Scheduling: creating a project timeline
4. Monitoring: monitoring students participation and article development, providing input if necessary.
2 X 50		 The lesson is conducted asynchronously with the following steps:
1. Determining fundamental questions: understanding the basic concept of academic article.
2. Project planning: understanding the procedure of creating article.
3. Scheduling: creating a project timeline
4. Monitoring: monitoring students participation and article development, providing input if necessary.
2 X 50		 Materi: relevant journals
Pustaka: Journals		 5%

14

Minggu ke 14

Being able to compose an original academic article on a preferred topic using appropriate grammar and mechanics

Write an original article on the area of literature or linguistics using appropriate structure, grammar, and mechanics

 Kriteria:
  1. Content with Title and Theme (1-4)
  2. Accuracy of Writing Procedure (1-4)
  3. Depth/Clarity of Content (1-4)
  4. Using appropriate mechanics (1-4)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 The lesson is conducted synchronously with the following steps:
1. Determining fundamental questions: understanding the basic concept of academic article.
2. Project planning: understanding the procedure of creating article.
3. Scheduling: creating a project timeline
4. Monitoring: monitoring students participation and article development, providing input if necessary.
2 X 50		 The lesson is conducted asynchronously with the following steps:
1. Determining fundamental questions: understanding the basic concept of academic article.
2. Project planning: understanding the procedure of creating article.
3. Scheduling: creating a project timeline
4. Monitoring: monitoring students participation and article development, providing input if necessary.
2 X 50		 Materi: relevant journals
Pustaka: Journals		 10%

15

Minggu ke 15

Being able to compose an original academic article on a preferred topic using appropriate grammar and mechanics

Write an original article on the area of literature or linguistics using appropriate structure, grammar, and mechanics

 Kriteria:
  1. Content with Title and Theme (1-4)
  2. Accuracy of Writing Procedure (1-4)
  3. Depth/Clarity of Content (1-4)
  4. Appropriate mechanics (1-4)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 The lesson is conducted synchronously with the following steps:
4. Monitoring: monitoring student‘s participation and article development, providing input if necessary.
5. Testing: discussing article drafts, measuring standard achievements, creating a presentation.
6. Reflection and Evaluation: presenting the project, responding to results, and reflecting on learning.
2 X 50		 The lesson is conducted synchronously with the following steps:
4. Monitoring: monitoring student‘s participation and article development, providing input if necessary.
5. Testing: discussing article drafts, measuring standard achievements, creating a presentation.
6. Reflection and Evaluation: presenting the project, responding to results, and reflecting on learning.
2 X 50		 Materi: relevant journals
Pustaka: Journals		 10%

16

Minggu ke 16

Being able to compose an original academic article on a preferred topic using appropriate grammar and mechanics

Write an original article on the area of literature or linguistics using appropriate structure, grammar, and mechanics

 Kriteria:
  1. Content with Title and Theme (1-4)
  2. Accuracy of Writing Procedure (1-4)
  3. Depth/Clarity of Content (1-4)
  4. Appropriate mechanics (1-4)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 The lesson is conducted synchronously with the following steps:
4. Monitoring: monitoring student‘s participation and article development, providing input if necessary.
5. Testing: discussing article drafts, measuring standard achievements, creating a presentation.
6. Reflection and Evaluation: presenting the project, responding to results, and reflecting on learning.
2 X 50		 The lesson is conducted synchronously with the following steps:
4. Monitoring: monitoring student‘s participation and article development, providing input if necessary.
5. Testing: discussing article drafts, measuring standard achievements, creating a presentation.
6. Reflection and Evaluation: presenting the project, responding to results, and reflecting on learning.
2 X 50		 Materi: relevant journals
Pustaka: Journals		 10%



Rekap Persentase Evaluasi : Project Based Learning

No Evaluasi Persentase
1. Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk 53%
2. Penilaian Portofolio 22%
3. Praktik / Unjuk Kerja 5%
4. Tes 20%
100%

Catatan

  1. Capaian Pembelajaran Lulusan Program Studi (PLO - Program Studi) adalah kemampuan yang dimiliki oleh setiap lulusan Program Studi yang merupakan internalisasi dari sikap, penguasaan pengetahuan dan ketrampilan sesuai dengan jenjang prodinya yang diperoleh melalui proses pembelajaran.
  2. PLO yang dibebankan pada mata kuliah adalah beberapa capaian pembelajaran lulusan program studi (CPL-Program Studi) yang digunakan untuk pembentukan/pengembangan sebuah mata kuliah yang terdiri dari aspek sikap, ketrampulan umum, ketrampilan khusus dan pengetahuan.
  3. Program Objectives (PO) adalah kemampuan yang dijabarkan secara spesifik dari PLO yang dibebankan pada mata kuliah, dan bersifat spesifik terhadap bahan kajian atau materi pembelajaran mata kuliah tersebut.
  4. Sub-PO Mata kuliah (Sub-PO) adalah kemampuan yang dijabarkan secara spesifik dari PO yang dapat diukur atau diamati dan merupakan kemampuan akhir yang direncanakan pada tiap tahap pembelajaran, dan bersifat spesifik terhadap materi pembelajaran mata kuliah tersebut.
  5. Indikator penilaian kemampuan dalam proses maupun hasil belajar mahasiswa adalah pernyataan spesifik dan terukur yang mengidentifikasi kemampuan atau kinerja hasil belajar mahasiswa yang disertai bukti-bukti.
  6. Kreteria Penilaian adalah patokan yang digunakan sebagai ukuran atau tolok ukur ketercapaian pembelajaran dalam penilaian berdasarkan indikator-indikator yang telah ditetapkan. Kreteria penilaian merupakan pedoman bagi penilai agar penilaian konsisten dan tidak bias. Kreteria dapat berupa kuantitatif ataupun kualitatif.
  7. Bentuk penilaian: tes dan non-tes.
  8. Bentuk pembelajaran: Kuliah, Responsi, Tutorial, Seminar atau yang setara, Praktikum, Praktik Studio, Praktik Bengkel, Praktik Lapangan, Penelitian, Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat dan/atau bentuk pembelajaran lain yang setara.
  9. Metode Pembelajaran: Small Group Discussion, Role-Play & Simulation, Discovery Learning, Self-Directed Learning, Cooperative Learning, Collaborative Learning, Contextual Learning, Project Based Learning, dan metode lainnya yg setara.
  10. Materi Pembelajaran adalah rincian atau uraian dari bahan kajian yg dapat disajikan dalam bentuk beberapa pokok dan sub-pokok bahasan.
  11. Bobot penilaian adalah prosentasi penilaian terhadap setiap pencapaian sub-PO yang besarnya proposional dengan tingkat kesulitan pencapaian sub-PO tsb., dan totalnya 100%.
  12. TM=Tatap Muka, PT=Penugasan terstruktur, BM=Belajar mandiri.