Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni
Program Studi S1 Sastra Inggris

Kode Dokumen

SEMESTER LEARNING PLAN

Course

KODE

Rumpun MataKuliah

Bobot Kredit

SEMESTER

Tanggal Penyusunan

Analisis Program Studi dan Proyek Independen

7920209091

T=0

P=4

ECTS=6.36

5

24 November 2024

OTORISASI

Pengembang S.P

Koordinator Rumpun matakuliah

Koordinator Program Studi




.......................................


.......................................


Dr. Ali Mustofa, S.S., M.Pd.

Model Pembelajaran

Project Based Learning

Program Learning Outcomes (PLO)

PLO program Studi yang dibebankan pada matakuliah

PLO-2

Menunjukkan karakter tangguh, kolaboratif, adaptif, inovatif, inklusif, belajar sepanjang hayat, dan berjiwa kewirausahaan

PLO-4

Mengembangkan diri secara berkelanjutan dan berkolaborasi.

PLO-5

Mampu mengaplikasikan konsep dan teori Linguistik dasar dalam Bahasa Inggris untuk merespons beragam fenomena bahasa

Program Objectives (PO)

PO - 1

Analyze and critique existing programs using appropriate evaluation frameworks

PO - 2

Develop a comprehensive project plan that includes scope, objectives, and timelines

PO - 3

Implement project management tools and techniques in their independent projects.

PO - 4

Present research findings clearly and concisely, demonstrating mastery of the subject matter.

Matrik PLO-PO
 
POPLO-2PLO-4PLO-5
PO-1  ✔
PO-2 ✔ 
PO-3  ✔
PO-4✔  

Matrik PO pada Kemampuan akhir tiap tahapan belajar (Sub-PO)
 
PO Minggu Ke
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
PO-1✔✔✔✔
PO-2✔✔✔✔
PO-3✔✔✔✔
PO-4✔✔✔✔

Deskripsi Singkat Mata Kuliah

This course provides students with a comprehensive understanding of program analysis techniques and independent project execution. Students will engage with theoretical frameworks and practical applications, enabling them to critically analyze existing programs and effectively manage independent projects. The course emphasizes hands-on experience, collaborative learning, and research methodologies, equipping students with the skills necessary for future academic and professional pursuits.

Pustaka

Utama :

  1. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. SAGE Publications.
  2. Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation Thesaurus. SAGE Publications.
  3. Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Control. Wiley.
  4. Pinto, J. K. (2010). Project Management: Achieving Competitive Advantage. Pearson.
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.
  6. Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2015). Practical Research: Planning and Design. Pearson.

Pendukung :

  1. Journals
  2. mendeley reference manager

Dosen Pengampu

Minggu Ke-

Kemampuan akhir tiap tahapan belajar
(Sub-PO)

Penilaian

Bantuk Pembelajaran,

Metode Pembelajaran,

Penugasan Mahasiswa,

 [ Estimasi Waktu]

Materi Pembelajaran

[ Pustaka ]

Bobot Penilaian (%)

Indikator

Kriteria & Bentuk

Luring (offline)

Daring (online)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

1

Minggu ke 1

Program Evaluation

Identify key performance indicators (KPIs) for program success.

 Kriteria:
  1. Quality of analysis (30%)
  2. Clarity of presentation (25%)
  3. Relevance of data used (25%)
  4. Peer feedback incorporation (20%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 offline
2 X 50		 online
2 X 50		 Materi: Evaluation for successfull program
Pustaka: Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. SAGE Publications.		 5%

2

Minggu ke 2

Program Evaluation

Conduct a SWOT analysis for an existing program.

 Kriteria:
  1. Quality of analysis (30%)
  2. Clarity of presentation (25%)
  3. Relevance of data used (25%)
  4. Peer feedback incorporation (20%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 offline
2 X 50		 online
2 X 50		 Materi: Evaluation for successfull program
Pustaka: Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. SAGE Publications.		 5%

3

Minggu ke 3

Program Evaluation

Prepare a detailed evaluation report based on qualitative and quantitative data.

 Kriteria:
  1. Quality of analysis (30%)
  2. Clarity of presentation (25%)
  3. Relevance of data used (25%)
  4. Peer feedback incorporation (20%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 offline
2 X 50		 online
2 X 50		 Materi: Evaluation for successfull program
Pustaka: Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. SAGE Publications.		 5%

4

Minggu ke 4

Program Evaluation

Present evaluation findings to peers and receive feedback.

 Kriteria:
  1. Quality of analysis (30%)
  2. Clarity of presentation (25%)
  3. Relevance of data used (25%)
  4. Peer feedback incorporation (20%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 offline
2 X 50		 online
2 X 50		 Materi: Evaluation for successfull program
Pustaka: Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. SAGE Publications.		 5%

5

Minggu ke 5

Project Learning

Define project scope and objectives

 Kriteria:
  1. Clarity of project scope (25%)
  2. Completeness of project timeline (30%)
  3. Identification of risks (20%)
  4. Budget accuracy (25%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Offline
2 X 50		 Online
2 X 50		 Materi: Define project scope and objectives
Pustaka: Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Control. Wiley.		 5%

6

Minggu ke 6

Project Planning

Develop a Gantt chart or similar project timeline

 Kriteria:
  1. Clarity of project scope (25%)
  2. Completeness of project timeline (30%)
  3. Identification of risks (20%)
  4. Budget accuracy (25%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Offline
2 X 50		 Online
2 X 50		 Materi: Develop a Gantt chart or similar project timeline
Pustaka: Pinto, J. K. (2010). Project Management: Achieving Competitive Advantage. Pearson.		 5%

7

Minggu ke 7

Project Planning

Develop a Gantt chart or similar project timeline

 Kriteria:
  1. Clarity of project scope (25%)
  2. Completeness of project timeline (30%)
  3. Identification of risks (20%)
  4. Budget accuracy (25%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Offline
2 X 50		 Online
2 X 50		 Materi: Develop a Gantt chart or similar project timeline
Pustaka: Pinto, J. K. (2010). Project Management: Achieving Competitive Advantage. Pearson.		 5%

8

Minggu ke 8

Create a budget estimation for the project

Develop a Gantt chart or similar project timeline

 Kriteria:
  1. Clarity of project scope (25%)
  2. Completeness of project timeline (30%)
  3. Identification of risks (20%)
  4. Budget accuracy (25%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Offline
2 X 50		 Online
2 X 50		 Materi: Develop a Gantt chart or similar project timeline
Pustaka: Pinto, J. K. (2010). Project Management: Achieving Competitive Advantage. Pearson.		 5%

9

Minggu ke 9

Project Execution

Implement project management tools

 Kriteria:
  1. Use of project management tools (25%)
  2. Ability to adapt plans (30%)
  3. Effectiveness of team communication (25%)
  4. Overall project adherence to timeline (20%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Penilaian Praktikum, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja, Tes		 Offline
2 X 50		 Online
2 X50		 Materi: Implement project management tools
Pustaka: Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.		 5%

10

Minggu ke 10

Project Execution

Monitor project progress against the plan

 Kriteria:
  1. Use of project management tools (25%)
  2. Ability to adapt plans (30%)
  3. Effectiveness of team communication (25%)
  4. Overall project adherence to timeline (20%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Penilaian Praktikum, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja, Tes		 Offline
2 X 50		 Online
2 X50		 Materi: Monitor project progress against the plan
Pustaka: Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.		 5%

11

Minggu ke 11

Project Execution

Adapt project plans based on ongoing evaluations

 Kriteria:
  1. Use of project management tools (25%)
  2. Ability to adapt plans (30%)
  3. Effectiveness of team communication (25%)
  4. Overall project adherence to timeline (20%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Penilaian Praktikum, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja, Tes		 Offline
2 X 50		 Online
2 X50		 Materi: Adapt project plans based on ongoing evaluations
Pustaka: Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.		 5%

12

Minggu ke 12

Project Execution

Conduct team meetings to ensure alignment

 Kriteria:
  1. Use of project management tools (25%)
  2. Ability to adapt plans (30%)
  3. Effectiveness of team communication (25%)
  4. Overall project adherence to timeline (20%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Penilaian Praktikum, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja, Tes		 Offline
2 X 50		 Online
2 X50		 Materi: Conduct team meetings to ensure alignment
Pustaka: Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.		 5%

13

Minggu ke 13

Research Presentation

Design a presentation that clearly conveys research findings

 Kriteria:
  1. Presentation clarity and structure (30%)
  2. Use of visual aids (25%)
  3. Ability to answer questions (20%)
  4. Quality of the written report (25%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk, Penilaian Portofolio, Penilaian Praktikum, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Offline
2 X 50		 Online
2 X50		 Materi: Design a presentation that clearly conveys research findings
Pustaka: Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2015). Practical Research: Planning and Design. Pearson.		 8%

14

Minggu ke 14

Research Presentation

Use appropriate visual aids to enhance understanding

 Kriteria:
  1. Presentation clarity and structure (30%)
  2. Use of visual aids (25%)
  3. Ability to answer questions (20%)
  4. Quality of the written report (25%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk, Penilaian Portofolio, Penilaian Praktikum, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Offline
2 X 50		 Online
2 X50		 Materi: Use appropriate visual aids to enhance understanding
Pustaka: Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2015). Practical Research: Planning and Design. Pearson.		 10%

15

Minggu ke 15

Research Presentation

Respond to audience questions effectively

 Kriteria:
  1. Presentation clarity and structure (30%)
  2. Use of visual aids (25%)
  3. Ability to answer questions (20%)
  4. Quality of the written report (25%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk, Penilaian Portofolio, Penilaian Praktikum, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Offline
2 X 50		 Online
2 X50		 Materi: Respond to audience questions effectively
Pustaka: Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2015). Practical Research: Planning and Design. Pearson.		 10%

16

Minggu ke 16

      Bentuk Penilaian :
      Penilaian Portofolio, Penilaian Praktikum, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja

      		Materi: Submit and summarizes the research process and findings
      Pustaka: Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2015). Practical Research: Planning and Design. Pearson.      		 11%



      Rekap Persentase Evaluasi : Project Based Learning

      No Evaluasi Persentase
      1. Aktifitas Partisipasif 23.96%
      2. Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk 18.96%
      3. Penilaian Portofolio 9.27%
      4. Penilaian Praktikum 14.27%
      5. Praktik / Unjuk Kerja 27.63%
      6. Tes 5%
      99.09%

      Catatan

      1. Capaian Pembelajaran Lulusan Program Studi (PLO - Program Studi) adalah kemampuan yang dimiliki oleh setiap lulusan Program Studi yang merupakan internalisasi dari sikap, penguasaan pengetahuan dan ketrampilan sesuai dengan jenjang prodinya yang diperoleh melalui proses pembelajaran.
      2. PLO yang dibebankan pada mata kuliah adalah beberapa capaian pembelajaran lulusan program studi (CPL-Program Studi) yang digunakan untuk pembentukan/pengembangan sebuah mata kuliah yang terdiri dari aspek sikap, ketrampulan umum, ketrampilan khusus dan pengetahuan.
      3. Program Objectives (PO) adalah kemampuan yang dijabarkan secara spesifik dari PLO yang dibebankan pada mata kuliah, dan bersifat spesifik terhadap bahan kajian atau materi pembelajaran mata kuliah tersebut.
      4. Sub-PO Mata kuliah (Sub-PO) adalah kemampuan yang dijabarkan secara spesifik dari PO yang dapat diukur atau diamati dan merupakan kemampuan akhir yang direncanakan pada tiap tahap pembelajaran, dan bersifat spesifik terhadap materi pembelajaran mata kuliah tersebut.
      5. Indikator penilaian kemampuan dalam proses maupun hasil belajar mahasiswa adalah pernyataan spesifik dan terukur yang mengidentifikasi kemampuan atau kinerja hasil belajar mahasiswa yang disertai bukti-bukti.
      6. Kreteria Penilaian adalah patokan yang digunakan sebagai ukuran atau tolok ukur ketercapaian pembelajaran dalam penilaian berdasarkan indikator-indikator yang telah ditetapkan. Kreteria penilaian merupakan pedoman bagi penilai agar penilaian konsisten dan tidak bias. Kreteria dapat berupa kuantitatif ataupun kualitatif.
      7. Bentuk penilaian: tes dan non-tes.
      8. Bentuk pembelajaran: Kuliah, Responsi, Tutorial, Seminar atau yang setara, Praktikum, Praktik Studio, Praktik Bengkel, Praktik Lapangan, Penelitian, Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat dan/atau bentuk pembelajaran lain yang setara.
      9. Metode Pembelajaran: Small Group Discussion, Role-Play & Simulation, Discovery Learning, Self-Directed Learning, Cooperative Learning, Collaborative Learning, Contextual Learning, Project Based Learning, dan metode lainnya yg setara.
      10. Materi Pembelajaran adalah rincian atau uraian dari bahan kajian yg dapat disajikan dalam bentuk beberapa pokok dan sub-pokok bahasan.
      11. Bobot penilaian adalah prosentasi penilaian terhadap setiap pencapaian sub-PO yang besarnya proposional dengan tingkat kesulitan pencapaian sub-PO tsb., dan totalnya 100%.
      12. TM=Tatap Muka, PT=Penugasan terstruktur, BM=Belajar mandiri.