Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni
Program Studi S1 Sastra Inggris (Kampus Kabupaten Magetan)

Kode Dokumen

SEMESTER LEARNING PLAN

Course

KODE

Rumpun MataKuliah

Bobot Kredit

SEMESTER

Tanggal Penyusunan

English Semantics and Pragmatics

7922103068

T=3

P=0

ECTS=4.77

4

22 November 2024

OTORISASI

Pengembang S.P

Koordinator Rumpun matakuliah

Koordinator Program Studi




.......................................


.......................................


Lisetyo Ariyanti, S.S., M.Pd.

Model Pembelajaran

Case Study

Program Learning Outcomes (PLO)

PLO program Studi yang dibebankan pada matakuliah

Program Objectives (PO)

PO - 1

Being able to classify linguistic devices such as appropriate dictions and utterances both in spoken and written texts

PO - 2

Being able to illustrate the contextual sociocultural phenomena based the concepts and theories of word meaning and speaker’s meaning

PO - 3

Being able to examine the appropriate approaches in meaning to analyze spoken and written text

PO - 4

Being able to respond various kind problem solving of word meaning and speaker‘s meaning in spoken and written text

Matrik PLO-PO
 
PO
PO-1
PO-2
PO-3
PO-4

Matrik PO pada Kemampuan akhir tiap tahapan belajar (Sub-PO)
 
PO Minggu Ke
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
PO-1
PO-2
PO-3
PO-4

Deskripsi Singkat Mata Kuliah

The lesson deals with linguistic meaning, kinds of basic elements to make reference in characterizing the meanings of words or other linguistic units,kinds of relevant data, and how to evaluate the various possible types of data and how word meanings change. Theoretical topics covered include categorization construal acquisition of concepts metaphor blending metonymy compositionality mental spaces lexical semantic change. Various semantic domains will be examined in connection with these topics, e.g. color terms, kinship, dimensional terms, verb meaning but two domains will be treated in depth from various perspectives: the semantics of everyday concepts, and the semantics of space and motion. For pragmatics theoritical frameworks are speech acts,implicature, presupposition, relevant theory, cooperative principles, politeness principles, references, deixies, contexts and co-texts. The final project is documenting the short functional teks are found in the public areas to interpret the communication functions.

Pustaka

Utama :

  1. References
  2. Crystal, D. 1995. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of English Language. New York: Cambridge :University Press.
  3. Cruse, D. A. 1990. Language Meaning and Sense: Semantics. In N. E. Collinge (Ed.). An Encyclopaedia of Language. London: Routledge
  4. Cruse, D. Alan.2000. Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics.NY: Oxford University Press.
  5. Cutting, Joan. 2002. Pragmatics and Discourse: A resource book for students. New York: Routledge.
  6. Griffiths, Patrick. 2006. An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  7. Kertez, Andras. 2004. Cognitive Semantics and Scientific Knowledge: Case studies in cognitive science of science. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company
  8. Riemer, Nick. 2010. Introducing Semantics. New York: Cambridge University Press
  9. Van Geenhoven, Veerle. 2006. Semantics in Acquisition. Netherland: Springer.
  10. George Yule: (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Pendukung :

Dosen Pengampu

Minggu Ke-

Kemampuan akhir tiap tahapan belajar
(Sub-PO)

Penilaian

Bantuk Pembelajaran,

Metode Pembelajaran,

Penugasan Mahasiswa,

 [ Estimasi Waktu]

Materi Pembelajaran

[ Pustaka ]

Bobot Penilaian (%)

Indikator

Kriteria & Bentuk

Luring (offline)

Daring (online)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

1

Minggu ke 1

By presenting Semantics definition, Meaning and the Dictionary
  1. To compare between language form and language meaning
  2. To explain and give examples of the scope of English Semantics
 Kriteria:
  1. Level 1: 50-59%
  2. Level 2: 60-69%
  3. Level 3: 70-79%
  4. Level 4: 80-100%

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 · Lecturing · Discussion · Question-Answer
3 X 50
Materi: 1. Griffiths, Patrick. 2006. An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Pustaka: 		3%

2

Minggu ke 2

By presenting Meaning and context External context: sense and reference
  1. To examine the unit of meanings
  2. To categorize different ways of defining meaning
 Kriteria:
  1. Level 1: 50-59%
  2. Level 2: 60-69%
  3. Level 3: 70-79%
  4. Level 4: 80-100%

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 · Lecturing · Discussion · Question-Answer
3 X 50
Materi: Various aspects of Semantic including sense and reference
Pustaka: Cruse, D. A. 1990. Language Meaning and Sense: Semantics. In N. E. Collinge (Ed.). An Encyclopaedia of Language. London: Routledge		 3%

3

Minggu ke 3

By presenting Meaning and context External context: sense and reference
  1. To define the different between meaning and context To compare the concept of sense and reference To find the concept of dictionary and encyclopedia
  2. o compare the concept of sense and reference
  3. To find the concept of dictionary and encyclopedia
 Kriteria:
  1. Level 1: 50-59%
  2. Level 2: 60-69%
  3. Level 3: 70-79%
  4. Level 4: 80-100%

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 · Lecturing · Discussion · Question-Answer
3 X 50
Materi: 1. Griffiths, Patrick. 2006. An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
Pustaka: References		 3%

4

Minggu ke 4

To understand the scope of meaning II: interpersonal context
  1. To outline the different between speaker intention and hearer's inference
  2. To outline the differences on antecedent and anaphora, and their aspects.
 Kriteria:
  1. Level 1: 50-59%
  2. Level 2: 60-69%
  3. Level 3: 70-79%
  4. Level 4: 80-100%

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 · Lecturing · Discussion · Question-Answer
3 X 50
Materi: • Speaker intention and hearer's inference , • Antecedent • Anaphora
Pustaka: Griffiths, Patrick. 2006. An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.		 3%

5

Minggu ke 5

To analyze and distinguish meanings To understand logic as representation of meaning
  1. To organize the lexical relations To categorize polysemy and meaning divisions To outline the different between speaker intention and hearers inference To outline the different between speaker intention and hearers inference To outline the different between speaker intention and hearers inference
  2. To focus on the componential analysis
 Kriteria:
  1. Level 1: 50-59%
  2. Level 2: 60-69%
  3. Level 3: 70-79%
  4. Level 4: 80-100%

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 · Lecturing · Discussion · Question-Answer
3 X 50
Materi: • Lexical relations • Componential analysis, • Polysemy and meaning divisions,
Pustaka: Griffiths, Patrick. 2006. An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.		 3%

6

Minggu ke 6

By identifying the componential analysis, Polysemy and meaning divisions
  1. To outline the different between speaker intention and hearer's inference To outline the different between speaker intention and hearer's inference
  2. To outline the different between speaker intention and hearer's inference
 Kriteria:
  1. Level 1: 50-59%
  2. Level 2: 60-69%
  3. Level 3: 70-79%
  4. Level 4: 80-100%

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 · Lecturing · Case study · Small group discussion · Question-Answer
3 X 50
Materi: Sections of polysemy and meaning divitions
Pustaka: Cruse, D. Alan.2000. Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics.NY: Oxford University Press.		 3%

7

Minggu ke 7

By identifying the componential analysis, Polysemy and meaning divisions
  1. Explaining the problem-based activities: 1. Giving the written text taken from authentic sources from the internet (social media) to the students. The text contains English sentences that may have specific lexical relation
  2. 2. Identifying the componential words, polysemy and meaning in divisions
 Kriteria:
  1. Level 1: 50-59%
  2. Level 2: 60-69%
  3. Level 3: 70-79%
  4. Level 4: 80-100%

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 ·Explaining the problem-based activities:
1. Giving the written text taken from authentic sources from the internet (social media) to the students. The text contains English sentences that may have specific lexical relation
2. Identifying the componential words, polysemy and meaning in divisions.
3 X 50
Materi: Sections of polysemy and meaning divisions
Pustaka: Cruse, D. Alan.2000. Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics.NY: Oxford University Press.		 3%

8

Minggu ke 8

Midtest Terms

Midtest terms

 Kriteria:
  1. Level 1 : 50 - 59%
  2. Level 2 : 60 - 69%
  3. Level 3 : 70 - 79%
  4. Level 4 : 80 - 100%

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Tes		 Formative / Take-home
3 X 50
Materi: All materials discussed in previous meetings
Pustaka: Cruse, D. Alan.2000. Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics.NY: Oxford University Press.		 20%

9

Minggu ke 9

To apply Deixis and Distance in a language which the speaker uses to express their intended meanings

To use information of Deixis and Distance in a language which the speaker uses to express their intended meanings in another familiar situation

 Kriteria:
  1. Level 1 : 50 - 59%
  2. Level 2 : 60 - 69%
  3. Level 3 : 70 - 79%
  4. Level 4 : 80 - 100%

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Small group discussion
3 X 50
Materi: The way language uses words to point to specific people, object, times or place
Pustaka: Crystal, D. 1995. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of English Language. New York: Cambridge :University Press.		 3%

10

Minggu ke 10

To apply Reference and Inference in a language which the speaker uses to express their intended meanings

To use information of Reference and Inference in a language which the speaker uses to express their intended meanings meanings in another familiar situation

 Kriteria:
  1. Level 1: 50-59%
  2. Level 2: 60-69%
  3. Level 3: 70-79%
  4. Level 4: 80-100%

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Small group discussion
3 X 50
Materi: How reference and inference play a crucial role in effective communication and interpretation of language
Pustaka: Griffiths, Patrick. 2006. An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.		 3%

11

Minggu ke 11

To apply Presupposition and Entailment in a language which the speaker uses to express their intended meanings

To use information of Presupposition and Entailment in a language which the speaker uses to express their intended meanings in another familiar situation

 Kriteria:
  1. Level 1 : 50 - 59%
  2. Level 2 : 60 - 69%
  3. Level 3 : 70 - 79%
  4. Level 4 : 80 - 100%

Bentuk Penilaian :
Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Small group discussion
3 X 50
Materi: Presupposition and Entailment in a language
Pustaka: Van Geenhoven, Veerle. 2006. Semantics in Acquisition. Netherland: Springer.		 3%

12

Minggu ke 12

To apply Cooperation and Implicature in a language which the speaker uses to express their intended meanings

To implement Cooperation and Implicature in a language which the speaker uses to express their intended meanings in another familiar situation

 Kriteria:
  1. Level 1 : 50 - 59%
  2. Level 2 : 60 - 69%
  3. Level 3 : 70 - 79%
  4. Level 4 : 80 - 100%

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Small group discussion
3 X 50
Materi: Cooperation and Implicature in a language
Pustaka: Van Geenhoven, Veerle. 2006. Semantics in Acquisition. Netherland: Springer.		 5%

13

Minggu ke 13

To apply Speech Acts and Events in a language which the speaker uses to express their intended meanings

To implement Speech Acts and Events in a language which the speaker uses to express their intended meanings in another familiar situation

 Kriteria:
  1. Level 1 : 50 - 59%
  2. Level 2 : 60 - 69%
  3. Level 3 : 70 - 79%
  4. Level 4 : 80 - 100%

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Explaining the problem-based activities:
1. Giving the written text taken from authentic sources from the internet (social media) to the students. The text contains English sentences that may have the implicature utterances.
2. Identifying the maxim of conversation in the social media in the internet.
3 X 50
Materi: Speech Acts and Events in a language
Pustaka: Cutting, Joan. 2002. Pragmatics and Discourse: A resource book for students. New York: Routledge.		 5%

14

Minggu ke 14

To apply Politeness and Interaction in a language which the speaker uses to express their intended meanings

To implement Politeness and Interaction in a language which the speaker uses to express their intended meanings in another familiar situation

 Kriteria:
  1. Level 1 : 50 - 59%
  2. Level 2 : 60 - 69%
  3. Level 3 : 70 - 79%
  4. Level 4 : 80 - 100%

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Small group discussion
3 X 50
Materi: Politeness and Interaction in a language
Pustaka: Van Geenhoven, Veerle. 2006. Semantics in Acquisition. Netherland: Springer.		 5%

15

Minggu ke 15

To apply Conversation and Preference Structure in a language which the speaker uses to express their intended meanings

To implement Conversation and Preference Structure in a language which the speaker uses to express their intended meanings in another familiar situation

 Kriteria:
  1. Level 1 : 50 - 59%
  2. Level 2 : 60 - 69%
  3. Level 3 : 70 - 79%
  4. Level 4 : 80 - 100%

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Small-Group Discussion
3 X 50
Materi: Conversation and Preference Structure
Pustaka: 		5%

16

Minggu ke 16

Final Examination
  1. Level 1 : 50 - 59%
  2. Level 2 : 60 - 69%
  3. Level 3 : 70 - 79%
  4. Level 4 : 80 - 100%
 Kriteria:

Final Examination


Bentuk Penilaian :
Tes		 Written test
3 x 50
Materi: All materials discussed in the classroom
Pustaka: Cutting, Joan. 2002. Pragmatics and Discourse: A resource book for students. New York: Routledge.		 30%



Rekap Persentase Evaluasi : Case Study

No Evaluasi Persentase
1. Aktifitas Partisipasif 39.5%
2. Praktik / Unjuk Kerja 20.5%
3. Tes 40%
100%

Catatan

  1. Capaian Pembelajaran Lulusan Program Studi (PLO - Program Studi) adalah kemampuan yang dimiliki oleh setiap lulusan Program Studi yang merupakan internalisasi dari sikap, penguasaan pengetahuan dan ketrampilan sesuai dengan jenjang prodinya yang diperoleh melalui proses pembelajaran.
  2. PLO yang dibebankan pada mata kuliah adalah beberapa capaian pembelajaran lulusan program studi (CPL-Program Studi) yang digunakan untuk pembentukan/pengembangan sebuah mata kuliah yang terdiri dari aspek sikap, ketrampulan umum, ketrampilan khusus dan pengetahuan.
  3. Program Objectives (PO) adalah kemampuan yang dijabarkan secara spesifik dari PLO yang dibebankan pada mata kuliah, dan bersifat spesifik terhadap bahan kajian atau materi pembelajaran mata kuliah tersebut.
  4. Sub-PO Mata kuliah (Sub-PO) adalah kemampuan yang dijabarkan secara spesifik dari PO yang dapat diukur atau diamati dan merupakan kemampuan akhir yang direncanakan pada tiap tahap pembelajaran, dan bersifat spesifik terhadap materi pembelajaran mata kuliah tersebut.
  5. Indikator penilaian kemampuan dalam proses maupun hasil belajar mahasiswa adalah pernyataan spesifik dan terukur yang mengidentifikasi kemampuan atau kinerja hasil belajar mahasiswa yang disertai bukti-bukti.
  6. Kreteria Penilaian adalah patokan yang digunakan sebagai ukuran atau tolok ukur ketercapaian pembelajaran dalam penilaian berdasarkan indikator-indikator yang telah ditetapkan. Kreteria penilaian merupakan pedoman bagi penilai agar penilaian konsisten dan tidak bias. Kreteria dapat berupa kuantitatif ataupun kualitatif.
  7. Bentuk penilaian: tes dan non-tes.
  8. Bentuk pembelajaran: Kuliah, Responsi, Tutorial, Seminar atau yang setara, Praktikum, Praktik Studio, Praktik Bengkel, Praktik Lapangan, Penelitian, Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat dan/atau bentuk pembelajaran lain yang setara.
  9. Metode Pembelajaran: Small Group Discussion, Role-Play & Simulation, Discovery Learning, Self-Directed Learning, Cooperative Learning, Collaborative Learning, Contextual Learning, Project Based Learning, dan metode lainnya yg setara.
  10. Materi Pembelajaran adalah rincian atau uraian dari bahan kajian yg dapat disajikan dalam bentuk beberapa pokok dan sub-pokok bahasan.
  11. Bobot penilaian adalah prosentasi penilaian terhadap setiap pencapaian sub-PO yang besarnya proposional dengan tingkat kesulitan pencapaian sub-PO tsb., dan totalnya 100%.
  12. TM=Tatap Muka, PT=Penugasan terstruktur, BM=Belajar mandiri.